Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
Date
Msg-id 4d35af4afe030041cf9bea394a31c0bfad9bb3cb.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to minimal wal_level on subscriber  ("Arnaud L." <arnaud.listes@codata.eu>)
Responses Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 12:09 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote:
> is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the 
> logical replication ?

Yes, if you don't want physical backups.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Inexplicable duplicate rows with unique constraint
Next
From: "Arnaud L."
Date:
Subject: Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber