On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 20:46, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 08:49, Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> This is an update the fourth of the patches to be split out from the
>>>> former 'plperl feature patch 1'.
>>>>
>>>> Changes in this patch:
>>>>
>>>> - Adds plperl.on_trusted_init and plperl.on_untrusted_init GUCs
>>>> on_trusted_init is PGC_USERSET, on_untrusted_init is PGC_SUSET
>>>
>>> Im not a fan of the names (I think everyone gets trusted vs untrusted
>>> confused). May I humbly suggest:
>>> plperl.on_init
>>> plperlu.on_init
>>> plperl.both_on_init <- this one is the one that throws the scheme off :(
>> With all due respect.... yuck.
heh, well I feel as reviewer its my job to solicit feed back from the
community. If I have to do it by suggesting gross names, so be it.
> OK, third time is the charm. Sigh. The "yuck" was in reference
> specifically to the proposed GUC names.
Yeah the both is gross. How about:
plperl.on_plperl_init
plperl.on_plperlu_init
plperl.on_init ?
> I like the original ones better.
I think they are OK.
