On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 23:14, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Tim Bunce wrote:
>>> - Added plperl.on_perl_init GUC for DBA use (PGC_SIGHUP)
>>> SPI functions are not available when the code is run.
>>>
>>> - Added normal interpreter destruction behaviour
>>> END blocks, if any, are run then objects are
>>> destroyed, calling their DESTROY methods, if any.
>>> SPI functions will die if called at this time.
>
>> So, are there still objections to applying this patch?
>
> Yes.
FWIW the atexit scares me to. I was thinking a good workaround
perhaps would be to provide a function that destroys the interpreter
(so that the END blocks get called). Tim would that work OK ? If we
are still worried about that hanging we can probably do something
hacky with alarm() and/or signals...
Maybe a good solid use case will help figure this out? Im assuming
the current one is to profile plperl functions and dump a prof file in
/tmp/ or some such (which happens at END time). Or did I miss the use
case in one of the other threads?
