Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Date
Msg-id 34d269d40901022232j2d5f8abfo46ba799fe88ac622@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 18:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> It would be fairly easy, I think, to add some reloption fields that
> would let these parameters be controlled on a per-table level.

+1

Or something easier that just lets you use PGLZ_Strategy strategy_always_data.

ALTER TABLE SET STORAGE ALWAYS_COMPRESS;

Or is that way to stop gap?

> Per-column would be much more painful; do we really need that?

Obviously not for 8.4 this late in the game.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Alex Hunsaker"
Date:
Subject: Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Documenting serializable vs snapshot isolation levels