Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] full JDBC driver ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Phil Thompson
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] full JDBC driver ?
Date
Msg-id 34E4DFC4.63E827BA@river-bank.demon.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [QUESTIONS] full JDBC driver ?  (Peter T Mount <postgresdev@maidast.demon.co.uk>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] full JDBC driver ?  (Peter T Mount <psqlhack@maidast.demon.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter T Mount wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote:
> >
> > > Getting most of the rest of DatabaseMetaData is my main priority after 6.3
> > > is released. However, there are some methods that cannot yet be
> > > implemented because postgresql itself isn't yet up to it.
> >
> >       Like?

Isn't the "right" way to do this to implement the standard
INFORMATION_SCHEMA, then all frontends have a decent model to work to?

Phil

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter T Mount
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MB patch
Next
From: al dev
Date:
Subject: performace speed up suggestions.