Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths
Date
Msg-id 34BEA5FD-6882-46FD-8DB2-0C8612FAF2E2@justatheory.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Why not create a branch? IIRC the build farm can be configured to run branches.
>
> I already know what the patch does against the regression tests.
> Buildfarm testing is not of interest here.  What would be of help is,
> say, Kevin volunteering to load up his Circuit Courts software and data
> into a git-head server and see how performance looks with and without
> the patch.  Distribution of the code doesn't strike me as being the
> bottleneck.

Yeah, but it would be easier to keep a branch up-to-date via `git rebase` than to maintain the patch, I would think.
Andif it’s a remote branch, then simpler distribution is a bonus. 

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths
Next
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC_REPORT for protocol tunables was: Re: Optimize binary serialization format of arrays with fixed size elements