Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim B. Mikheev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP
Date
Msg-id 34B05E39.64A9E3FF@sable.krasnoyarsk.su
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Integration wrote:
>
> ps. why not allow for larger tuples in general?  Do we take a speed hit?

Using large blocks is bad for performance: by increasing block size
you automatically decrease number of blocks in shared buffer pool -
this is bad for index scans and in multi-user environment!
Just remember that Informix (and others) use 2K blocks.
(Actually, I would like to have smaller blocks, but postgres lives
over file system...)

As for having big tuples - someone said about multi-representation
feature of Illustra (automatically storing of big fields outside
of tuple itself - in blobs, large objects, ...): looks very nice.

Vadim

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP