"Spencer Riddering" <spencer@riddering.net> writes:
> When a LOCK TABLE statement is included in a plpgsql function it does not
> actually lock the table.
Sure it does. If it doesn't, your test case surely will not prove it;
you cannot prove the existence or lack of existence of a lock in a test
case with only one connection...
I suspect your complaint really has to do with the fact that the
transaction snapshot is established before the function is entered,
and thus before the lock is taken. Pre-8.0, we did not advance the
snapshot within functions, and so the commands within the function
would all see a snapshot that predated the obtaining of the lock.
Short answer: try 8.0.
regards, tom lane
