Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
Date
Msg-id 3481656.1648245290@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
List pgsql-hackers
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 25 Mar 2022, at 19:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'd vote for changing the behavior of --table rather than trying to
>> be bug-compatible with this decision.

> Agreed.  Question is what to do for "-t pg_class", should we still forbid
> dumping system catalogs when they are pattern matched without wildcard or is
> should that be ok? And should this depend on if "-n pg_catalog" is used?

I don't think there's anything really wrong with just "we won't dump
system objects, full stop"; I don't see much use-case for doing that
except maybe debugging, and even that is a pretty thin argument.

However, a possible compromise is to say that we act as though
--exclude-schema=pg_catalog is specified unless you explicitly
override that with "--schema=pg_catalog".  (And the same for
information_schema, I suppose.)  This might be a bit hacky to
implement :-(

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable SSL library detection via PQsslAttribute