Re: Hosting Service Recommendations - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alex Turner
Subject Re: Hosting Service Recommendations
Date
Msg-id 33c6269f0504250804474c08da@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Hosting Service Recommendations  (Chris Kratz <chris.kratz@vistashare.com>)
Responses Re: Hosting Service Recommendations
List pgsql-general
I have found that even the larger hosting companies such as Rackspace
are pretty clueless when trying to configure even a mid size database
server.  They gave us a 4 drive raid 5 even after being explicitly
asked for a RAID 10. They also put the controller in write through
cache mode.  Pretty bad config - the server blew chunks, our single
drive ATA cheapo box ran significantly faster.

I would definatley suggest looking at co-lo.

Alex Turner
netEconomist

On 4/25/05, Chris Kratz <chris.kratz@vistashare.com> wrote:
> It seems the consensus on this list is that when running postgres, Opterons
> outperform Xeons by a significant margin not to mention the CS storms
> postgres seems to cause on Xeons.  We are looking for a hosting service for a
> postgresql based application.  Unfortunately, it seems most services
> standardize on Dell and by extension Xeon hardware.  Do anyone have
> recommendations for hosting services that would be able to provide Opteron
> based hardware and have decent service?  Or are we stuck with Xeons?
> --
> Chris Kratz
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ned Lilly
Date:
Subject: OpenRPT (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 24 2005 ==)
Next
From: Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com
Date:
Subject: Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD