On 7/5/2025 08:57, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Andrei Lepikhov писал(а) 2025-05-07 08:02:
>> On 5/5/2025 15:56, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>>> Andrei Lepikhov писал(а) 2025-05-05 14:38:
>>> Also logic a bit differs if path is NULL. In
>>> get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys_ext() we explicitly check for path
>>> being NULL, in get_cheapest_fractional_path_for_pathkeys_ext() only
>>> after calculating sort cost.
>>>
>>> I've tried to fix comments a bit and unified functions definitions.
>> Generally seems ok, I'm not a native speaker to judge the comments. But:
>> if (base_path && path != base_path)
>>
>> What is the case in your mind where the base_path pointer still may be
>> null at that point?
>
> Hi.
>
> It seems if some childrel doesn't have valid pathlist, subpaths_valid
> would be false in add_paths_to_append_rel()
> and generate_orderedappend_paths() will not be called. So when we
> iterate over live_childrels,
> all of them will have cheapest_total path. This is why we can assert
> that base_path is not NULL.
I'm not sure I understand you correctly. Under which conditions will
rel->cheapest_total_path be set to NULL for a childrel? Could you
provide an example?
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
