Re: elog(NOIND)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: elog(NOIND)?
Date
Msg-id 3323.991850608@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to elog(NOIND)?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: elog(NOIND)?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Does anyone want to keep elog(NOIND)?  It's not used anywhere, and I think
> the notion of indentation levels, while kind of obsolete with syslog
> anyway, should not be part of the elog API.

Nuke it.

While you're at it, rearrange the numeric order of the elog levels to be
sensible.  There are some bizarrely-coded tests in elog.c that could be
simplified if severity levels had the obvious ordering.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Feng Tian
Date:
Subject: Adding some new operators
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Dual-CPU slower then Single under HP?