Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding
Date
Msg-id 330a093a-d155-c866-cbf2-8f36fdf51e95@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/6/17 11:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/5/17 21:32, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>> At Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:33:51 -0400, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in
<5401fef6-c0c0-7e8a-d8b1-169e30cbd854@2ndquadrant.com>
>>> After further thinking, I prefer the alternative approach of using
>>> pq_sendcountedtext() as is and sticking the trailing zero byte on on the
>>> receiving side.  This is a more localized change, and keeps the logical
>>> replication protocol consistent with the main FE/BE protocol.  (Also, we
>>> don't need to send a useless byte around.)
>>
>> I'm not sure about the significance of the trailing zero in the
>> the logical replication protocol.
> 
> It doesn't matter.  It could be "nice" to have it because then the
> receiving side doesn't need to add it if it wants to assemble a C
> string.  But for the reasons above, it doesn't seem worth doing that.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM authentication, take three