On Dec 23, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Dec 23, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Uh ... I don't see what that fixes? If CONCURRENTLY can be a column
>>> name this is still ambiguous.
>
>> How?
>
> Because CONCURRENTLY can still be reduced as tricky_index_name, so
> it still doesn't know how to parse CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON ...
It compiles without warnings for me. There's only one production that
allows exactly one word between INDEX and ON.
...Robert
