inverse variable becomes unused, will remove
Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Seems to be due to sloppy division of changes between f50c80dbb (which
> was not back-patched) and 563a053bd. Please fix.
>
>
> Thank you for catching this. You diagnosis is right.
> I propose to commit the attached patch to 10 and 9.6.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/