Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options
Date
Msg-id 329.1001818599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes:
> Retiring -o would seem like a good idea.

That was what I was thinking too.  I can think of ways to reimplement
-o options so that they work safely ... but is it worth the trouble?
AFAICS, -o options confuse both people and machines, and have no
redeeming value beyond supporting old startup scripts.  Which could
easily be updated.

Some judicious feature removal may be the best path here.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: Pre-forking backend