Re: Constraint question - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Constraint question
Date
Msg-id 3260.1147706251@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Constraint question  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: Constraint question
List pgsql-admin
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:50:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Enzo Daddario <enzo@pienetworks.com> writes:
>>> I am now required the remove thousands of obsolete records from table
>>> "X" and even though I have removed all related rows in all related
>>> tables, the deletion of rows in table "X" is taking WAY TOO LONG.
>>
>> You need to put indexes on the referencing columns.  Then start a fresh
>> session for doing the actual deletes (FK check plans are usually cached
>> per-session).

> Would SET CONSTRAINTS ... DEFERRED not help, or does it still use the
> same machinery to do the checking, regardless of how much data there is
> to check?

It's the same machinery.  We've speculated about having the thing switch
over to doing a full-table recheck (comparable to what ADD CONSTRAINT
FOREIGN KEY does) once the number of pending individual row checks
exceeds some threshold, but that's not done yet --- and it's not clear
how to do it in a concurrent fashion, so don't hold your breath ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: increasing max_fsm_pages.
Next
From: "Xu, Xiaoyi \(Rocky\) FSM"
Date:
Subject: Error in MS Access