> On Mar 31, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Stephan Knauss <pgsql@stephans-server.de> writes:
>> Hello Tom, the output below looks similar to the OOM output you
>> expected. Can you give a hint how to interpret the results?
>
> Looks like the answer is that wherever the leak is, it's not accounted
> for by this info; none of those contexts are particularly large.
>
> Based on nearby threads, it occurs to me to ask whether you have JIT
> enabled, and if so whether turning it off helps. There seems to be
> a known leak of the code fragments generated by that in some cases.
>
> If that's not it, then the leak must be accumulating through plain
> old malloc calls. There's not much of that in the core backend
> (although if you use ispell text search dictionaries, maybe [1] is
> relevant), so my suspicions would next fall on any extensions you
> might be using.
Would be interested in the queries being run. We have a reproduceable leak in <-> geography operator that we have been
unableto track down.
P
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=eba939551
>
>
