Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 03:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I intend to look at that tomorrow. Meanwhile, have you got a fix
>> for bug#1500?
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-02/msg00226.php
> Sorry. Not yet. I haven't time today. Maybe next week :-(
I looked at this and found the problem is that dch_date() isn't
defending itself against the possibility that tm->tm_mon is zero,
as it well might be for an interval. What do you think about
just adding
case DCH_MONTH:
+ if (!tm->tm_mon)
+ return 0; strcpy(workbuff, months_full[tm->tm_mon - 1]); sprintf(inout, "%*s",
S_FM(suf)? 0 : -9, str_toupper(workbuff)); if (S_FM(suf)) return strlen(p_inout) - 1;
else return 8;
and similarly in each of the other case arms that use tm_mon?
This would case "MON" to convert to a null string for intervals,
which is probably as good as we can do.
regards, tom lane
