Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost
Date
Msg-id 322474.1651244056@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Really?  Maybe I misunderstand the case under consideration, but
> what I think will be happening is that each worker will re-execute
> the pushed-down subquery in full.

Oh ... nevermind that: what I was thinking about was the SubLink/SubPlan
case, which is unrelated to SubqueryScan.  -ENOCAFFEINE, sorry about that.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost