Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role
Date
Msg-id 321.1331876025@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role
List pgsql-hackers
Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> writes:
> The way MyCancelKey is checked now is backwards, in my mind.  It seems
> like it would be better checked by the receiving PID (one can use a
> check/recheck also, if so inclined).  Is there a large caveat to that?

You mean, other than the fact that kill(2) can't transmit such a key?

But actually I don't see what you hope to gain from such a change,
even if it can be made to work.  Anyone who can do kill(SIGINT) can
do kill(SIGKILL), say --- so you have to be able to trust the signal
sender.  What's the point of not trusting it to verify the client
identity?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role
Next
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role