On 09.09.21 16:08, Vik Fearing wrote:
>> Even without that point, this patch *is* going to break valid queries,
>> because every one of those cases is a valid number-followed-by-identifier
>> today,
>
> Ah, true that. So if this does go in, we may as well add the
> underscores at the same time.
Yeah, looks like I'll need to look into the identifier lexing issues
previously discussed. I'll attack that during the next commit fest.
>> so I kind of wonder why we're in such a hurry to adopt something
>> that hasn't even made it past draft-standard status.
> I don't really see a hurry here. I am fine with waiting until the draft
> becomes final.
Right, the point is to explore this now so that it can be ready when the
standard is ready.
