Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid
Date
Msg-id 31a88eb0-8ef7-e1e7-affe-daecb50aee32@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid  (Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@openscg.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/1/17 09:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2/22/17 19:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while 
>>> pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose 
>>> (especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be 
>>> nice to fix it.
>>
>> I'm in favor of changing it, but it could theoretically break someone's
>> code.
> 
> Yes, it was an oversight.  +1 for changing.

OK done.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability