On 3/1/17 9:24 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/1/17 09:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 2/22/17 19:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>> pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while
>>>> pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose
>>>> (especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be
>>>> nice to fix it.
>>>
>>> I'm in favor of changing it, but it could theoretically break someone's
>>> code.
>>
>> Yes, it was an oversight. +1 for changing.
>
> OK done.
BTW, did you backpatch as well? The function was added in 9.5.
Presumably we wouldn't normally do that, but if we think this is unused
enough maybe it's worth it.
--
Jim Nasby, Chief Data Architect, OpenSCG
