Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I can't do MemSet in a macro that returns a value, as palloc requires.
> MemSet has a loop, and that can't be done in a macro that returns a value.
Hm. How did Neil test this originally --- was he relying on being able
to "inline" newNode()?
Anyway, I don't think that passing an extra parameter can be a win.
If there has to be a runtime test, testing whether the two low bits
of the length are zero is probably about the same speed as testing a
boolean parameter. It's unlikely to be enough slower to justify the
cost of passing another parameter.
regards, tom lane
