Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
Date
Msg-id 3131835.1740898833@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt  (Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 10:26 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This looks reasonably in line with project style ...

> Should I create a commitfest entry for this patch, or is it
> uncontroversial enough and small enough to not warrant that?

The controversy would be more about whether it's worth bothering
with.  In the past we've taken some care to ensure that generated
files would pass pgindent's ideas of correct formatting, but
not more than that.  AFAICT from some quick tests, pgindent has
no opinions about layout of #define lines.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
Next
From: Junwang Zhao
Date:
Subject: Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations