Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)
Date
Msg-id 312AA1F0-E22A-4AAD-A032-02A4A33ADB09@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On May 28, 2021, at 6:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>>>> On Mar 4, 2020, at 7:43 PM, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>>>> as mentioned in [1], I have created an implementation of command
>>>> counter statistics very similar in purpose to the one already
>>>> pending in the commitfest going by the name "pg_stat_sql".  I don't
>>>> really care if this implementation is seen as building on that one
>>>> or as separate, but I was worried about hijacking that thread, so
>>>> I'm starting this thead. There are elements of this patch that
>>>> borrowed from that one, so if this is accepted, authorship should
>>>> reflect that.
>
> Hello, was this abandoned or is there another thread somewhere?  The
> patch in the email I'm replying to doesn't apply, but the conflicts
> don't look very bad.

I abandoned it for v14, choosing instead to work on amcheck features.  Would you like me to take this up again for v15?

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Add ZSON extension to /contrib/
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: be-secure-gssapi.c and auth.c with setenv() not compatible on Windows