>> IMO, the set of cases where it's legitimate to mark individual struct
>> fields as const is negligibly small, and this doesn't seem to be one
>> of them.
>
> Thanks for the report, will fix.
>
>> BTW, as another nitpicky style matter: why do PGoauthBearerRequest
>> etc. spell their struct tag names differently from their typedef names
>> (that is, with/without an underscore)? That is not our project style
>> anywhere else, and I'm failing to detect a good reason to do it here.
>
> Indeed it isn't, the only explanation is that I missed it. Will fix.
The attached diff passes CI and works for me, will revisit in the morning.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
