Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Date
Msg-id 30d523bb-19d6-35f0-970c-b2bc5ff27b18@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/31/17 16:50, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Not sure if disabling RETURN is good idea. I can imagine so optional
> returning something like int status can be good idea. Cheaper than
> raising a exception.

We could allow a RETURN without argument in PL/pgSQL, if you just want
to exit early.  That syntax is currently not available, but it should
not be hard to add.

I don't understand the point about wanting to return an int.  How would
you pass that around, since there is no declared return type?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures