Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> Is everybody in agreement about committing and back patching this fix,
> which simply disables the optimization altogether?
> I myself don't see a better way, but thought I'd ask before proceeding
> with review and commit.
If you don't see a clear path forward, then "disable" is the only
reasonable choice for the back branches. Maybe we'll find a fix
in future, but it seems unlikely that it'd be back-patchable.
regards, tom lane
