Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
Date
Msg-id 3073cc9b1001111114j7ddacd56p8966f9d61997a8b@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Jaime Casanova
> <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> It might be useful to turn on trace_sort to see if the small files
>>> are coming from sorts.  If they're from hashes I'm afraid there's
>>> no handy instrumentation ...
>>>
>>
>> yes they are, this is the log (i deleted the STATEMENT lines because
>> they were redundant), seems like all the temp files are used to
>> execute the same sentence...
>>
>> BTW, this is my laptop no the server.
>
> I think maybe there was supposed to be an attachment here?
>

i knew i was forgotting something ;)
ah! and this is in 8.5dev but it's the same in 8.3

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue