Re: Partitioning feature ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Partitioning feature ...
Date
Msg-id 3073cc9b0903300759o433f7fc7o15bec26498c12bcd@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning feature ...  (Kedar Potdar <kedar.potdar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioning feature ...  (Emmanuel Cecchet <manu@frogthinker.org>)
Re: Partitioning feature ...  (Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil.sontakke@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Kedar Potdar <kedar.potdar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  As triggers are executed in order of their names, we've prefixed the
>> trigger names with "zz". This should work fine as long as no-one uses
>> trigger-name which starts with "zz".
>>

this seems a lot fragile... why system generated triggers has to be
executed following the same rules (talking about order of execution)
as user triggers? can't we simply execute them first or last or maybe
be clever and mark one to be executed first and others last?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf