Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date
Msg-id b42b73150903300801r3c3dc765k32f7f6a6164bac23@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>> I personally would be happy with the two-argument function solution.
>>>
>>
>> I modified my previous patch to use a two-argument function solution.
>
> This looks OK to me, except I think we should modify the documentation
> to PQinitSSL() to say that it you must not use both that function and
> PQinitSecure(), and explain that if you need to control initialization
> of libcrypto and libssl, you should use that function instead.

do you think PQinitSSL should be deprecated?

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning feature ...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf