Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Date
Msg-id 30647.1547510590@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-01-14 18:53:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But I suspect just doing the revert is already going to be painful
>> enough :-(

> I assume you're not particularly interested in doing that?

No, I'm willing to do it, and will do so tomorrow if there haven't
been objections.

What I'm not willing to do is write hacks for pg_upgrade or pg_dump
to mask cases where the option has been set on a v11 index.  I judge
that it's not worth the trouble.  If someone else disagrees, they
can do that work.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes