Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Date
Msg-id 3052c83e-23ed-fde5-fe58-f1cfda1cdafa@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019/03/26 1:53, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Here's v6 of this patch.  I have rebased on top of today's CLUSTER
> monitoring, as well as on table AM commits.  The latter caused a bit of
> trouble, as now the number of blocks processed by a scan is not as easy
> to get as before; I added a new entry point heapscan_get_blocks_done on
> heapam.c to help with that.  (I suppose this will need some fixups later
> on.)
> 
> I removed the "M of N" phase labels that Robert didn't like; those were
> suggested by Rahila and upvoted by Amit L.  I'm of two minds about
> those.  If you care about those and want them back, please speak up.

On second thought, I'm neutral on it too.

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: psql display of foreign keys
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Misleading errors with column references in default expressions andpartition bounds