Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code
Date
Msg-id 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434AA0E@cuthbert.rcsinc.local
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> So, by my logic, if we have 100 backends all doing updates, we will
need
> 10 * 100 or 1000 writer processes or threads to keep up with that
load.
> That seems quite excessive to me from a context switching and process
> overhead perspective.

Quick point:
A single process using multiple threads dedicated to writing is an
excellent optimization target on the win32 platform, (and if it is
similarly useful on other platforms, so much the better).  To my way of
thinking, this is an ideal approach in the long run.

Multiple processes scheduling writes (even it is only 10), IMO, is a bad
idea because of the way process management on win32 works for various
reasons.

Merlin


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 pg_ctl
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code