Re: Re: Notes about int8 sequences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lincoln Yeoh
Subject Re: Re: Notes about int8 sequences
Date
Msg-id 3.0.5.32.20010807142025.00934380@192.228.128.13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Notes about int8 sequences  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 07:02 PM 06-08-2001 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>pseudo-type should generate an int8 instead of int4 column.  On
>compatibility grounds, it might be better to leave it generating int4,
>and invent a second pseudo-type SERIAL8 that is just the same except
>for making an int8 column.  I'm more worried about changing the datatype
>of a user column than I am about changing the output type of nextval(),
>so I'd be sort of inclined to have two SERIAL types even if we change
>nextval() to int8.  Thoughts?

serial8 sounds ok to me.

I use currval.

Cheerio,
Link.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Next
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: failed: make install prefix=/foo/bar