Re: Functions too slow, even with iscachable? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: Functions too slow, even with iscachable?
Date
Msg-id 3.0.5.32.20000808010738.0281eca0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Functions too slow, even with iscachable?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Functions too slow, even with iscachable?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
At 10:58 7/08/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>Looks like we need to teach the optimizer that expressions involving
>params can be treated like simple params for the purposes of
>optimization.
>

So long as the function is cacheable...


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498)             |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Functions too slow, even with iscachable?
Next
From: Rob van der Leek
Date:
Subject: Changing user passwords