At 00:21 12/07/00 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
>
>Well, not wanting to sound too much like a broken record,
>
> insert...returning...
>
>would seem to fix the problem.
>
>Is there some obvious (to anyone who knows something about pg internals)
>reason why this is *not* a good idea?
>
Putting this another way, does anyone object to this being implemented, *at
least* in the case of single row updates?
Secondly, can anyone suggest likely problems that would occur in a naieve
'do a select after an insert' or 'keep a list of affected oids' approach?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
