Re: pg_backup symlink? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: pg_backup symlink?
Date
Msg-id 3.0.5.32.20000711083311.029f4450@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_backup symlink?  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Responses Re: pg_backup symlink?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: pg_backup symlink?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 00:24 11/07/00 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Philip Warner writes:
>
>> Does anyone have a philosophical objection to a symlink from pg_dump to
>> (new) pg_backup?
>
>Yes. The behaviour of a program should not depend on the name used to
>invoke it. You can use shell aliases or scripts for that.

OK, I suppose I was thinking of the pg_dump symlink as a tool for
compatibility. 

Is there a good solution? It dumps to text for compatibility with the old
pg_dump, but I will most often use 'pg_dump -Fc --blob'. Is there a
recommended 'correct' approach?


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498)             |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: more corruption
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_backup symlink?