> Indeed this function doesn't cache anything and explicitly calls pg_strdup.
>
> Here the amount of leaked memory is likely to be very small (I never heard of
> people having thousands of text search templates or parsers), and pg_dump isn't
> a long lived process so probably no one thought it was worth to extra code to
> free that memory, which I agree with.
Thank you for your conformation.
I am also grateful for your patient explanation to what I don't understand.
Thank you all.
