Re: Replication Syatem - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Replication Syatem
Date
Msg-id 2e78013d0804300025j10567a82x5845ab8bc3d4f2a2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Replication Syatem  ("Gauri Kanekar" <meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Replication Syatem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Gauri Kanekar
<meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com> wrote:
> fillfactor is set to 80 as you suggested.
> delta* fields r updated and these fields are no where related to any of the
> index fields.
>

That's weird. With that fillfactor, you should have a very high
percentage of HOT update ratio. It could be a very special case that
we might be looking at. I think a self contained test case or a very
detail explanation of the exact usage is what we need to explain this
behavior. You may also try dropping non-critical indexes and test
again.

Btw, I haven't been able to reproduce this at my end. With the given
indexes and kind of updates, I get very high percentage of HOT
updates.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Gauri Kanekar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication Syatem
Next
From: "Heikki Linnakangas"
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication Syatem