Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong
Date
Msg-id 2e78013d0804032248j6b0d6683sea192d7260eb0ff2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong  (Stuart Brooks <stuartb@cat.co.za>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

>  The
>  policy of this project is that we only put nontrivial bug fixes into
>  back branches, and I don't think this item qualifies ...
>

Got it. I will submit a patch for HEAD.

Thanks,
Pavan


--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Chris Velevitch"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump ignoring without oids
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump ignoring without oids