Re: Problem with autovacuum and pg_autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Problem with autovacuum and pg_autovacuum
Date
Msg-id 2e78013d0707052300u6d8a8ba9l4ce4c35eba35dc2f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem with autovacuum and pg_autovacuum  (Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail@wars-nicht.de>)
Responses Re: Problem with autovacuum and pg_autovacuum  (Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail@wars-nicht.de>)
List pgsql-general


On 7/5/07, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail@wars-nicht.de> wrote:

Hello,

On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:04:35 -0400 Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Most likely it is worried about XID wraparound, and those are precisely
> the tables that need urgent vacuumed because they haven't been vacuumed
> in a long time.

No, autovacuum is doing this with every run. Beside this, the database has
only some 10k changes per day. The wraparound was my first idea, but i
don't see a reason, why this should be happen with every autovacuum run.


Did you check freeze_max_age values in the pg_autovacuum table ? A very
small value can trigger XID wraparound related VACUUMs in every run.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chris Travers
Date:
Subject: Re: Localization trouble
Next
From: Hannes Dorbath
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch2 in multilingual database?