Re: Patch queue triage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Patch queue triage
Date
Msg-id 2e78013d0705030144n6d536f49s104c94f9dcb2ce6f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch queue triage  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Patch queue triage
List pgsql-hackers

On 5/2/07, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

Can we? I mean, sure you can break the patch up into chunks which might make
it easier to read, but are any of the chunks useful alone?

Well I agree, it would be a tough job. I can try and break the patch into
several self-complete incremental patches which compile and work, but
I am worried about missing something somewhere and/or inserting
any bugs in the process.
 
I suppose inserting HOT tuples without index maintenance is useful even if no
changes to the space allocation is made is useful. It won't get the space
usage but it would save on index thrashing. But that still implies all the
code to handle scans, updates, index builds, etc. Those chunks could be
separated out but you can't commit without them.


There are few things that we can separate easily, like CREATE INDEX
related changes, VACUUM and VACUUM FULL related changed, space
reuse related changes etc. Let me give it a shot.

Thanks,
Pavan


--

EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequential scans
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequential scans