On 4/3/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I'm not particularly worried about missing a potential improvement
in the plan during the first command after a change is committed.
Me too. Just noticed it, so brought it up.
If the invalidation were something that *had* to be accounted for,
such as a dropped index, then there should be adequate locking for it;
plancache is not introducing any new bug that wasn't there before.
Oh yes, I was wondering about the other parts of the code, not
plan invalidation. Never mind, it was just a thought.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
