Re: Ctid chain following enhancement - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Ctid chain following enhancement
Date
Msg-id 2e78013d0701282319g595c3cb7x44289ac1264103@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ctid chain following enhancement  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-patches

On 1/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
OTOH it might be
cleaner to refactor things that way, if we were going to apply this.


Here is a revised patch which includes refactoring of
heap_get_latest_tid(), as per Tom's suggestion.

Thanks,
Pavan

--

EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: pg_dump missing arguments in docs