Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Date
Msg-id 20070128233611.GF32296@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 05:02:24PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I don't like that because it parenthesizes the most important part of
> > > the message, which is a style-guideline violation at least in spirit.
> > > How about
> > >
> > >         ... terminated by signal 10: Bus error
> >
> > I like that.
>
> OK, but you guys added back that colon you didn't like.  :-)

Placement is crucial.  Compare

terminated by signal 10: Bus error <-- proposed version
terminated by signal: 10 Bus error <-- older version

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)
Next
From: "Pavan Deolasee"
Date:
Subject: Re: Ctid chain following enhancement