Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Date
Msg-id 200701292102.l0TL28l21551@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-patches
David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 05:02:24PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > I don't like that because it parenthesizes the most important part of
> > > > the message, which is a style-guideline violation at least in spirit.
> > > > How about
> > > >
> > > >         ... terminated by signal 10: Bus error
> > >
> > > I like that.
> >
> > OK, but you guys added back that colon you didn't like.  :-)
>
> Placement is crucial.  Compare
>
> terminated by signal 10: Bus error <-- proposed version
> terminated by signal: 10 Bus error <-- older version

FYI, that was not the old version.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting