Patch rejected, not held for 8.4, because it uglifies the code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On 1/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > OTOH it might be
> > cleaner to refactor things that way, if we were going to apply this.
> >
> >
> Here is a revised patch which includes refactoring of
> heap_get_latest_tid(), as per Tom's suggestion.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan
>
> --
>
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
